16 Comments
User's avatar
Chris's avatar

The LNP and Labour both pursued catastrophic and evil policies during covid. The MSM are desperately trying to continue to peddle the "safe and effective" lie, as the bodies mount up from excess deaths.

The disasterous response is emblematic of the total dysfunction of these two groups. We need jailings and removal from office of any who supported this idiocy.

One Nation, Libertarians and UAP were the only sensible parties. Vote for them not the criminals in Labour and LNP!

Expand full comment
Jillian Stirling's avatar

Indeed. The scandal surrounding AstraZeneca should put Morrison and Hunt in jail.

Expand full comment
chris n barb sheppard's avatar

What scandal is that? AstraZeneca is a reputable company that produced a new Covid vaccine based on traditional vaccine technology. Pfizer and others introduced a new mRNA technology Covid vaccine which has been marketed globally without any long term safety and efficacy data. These vaccines obviously do not meet the expected standard of efficacy, and long term safety and side-effects have yet to be discovered. BARB

Expand full comment
Jillian Stirling's avatar

The one about the withdrawal of the adenovirus injection and the cases of death and TTS with victims seeking redress from AstraZeneca. Blood clots and death have followed AstraZeneca as country after country withdrew the covid injection from use and Hunt was still telling us that it was safe and effective. There are questions about the actual testing data as well. One victim who was part of the testing had her data removed from the final results and is seeking help and redress from AstraZeneca who promised to help with medical bill. Read Maryam Demasi’s latest Substack. There are no good injections for Covid or any virus. Read Turtles all the way Down.

Expand full comment
Chris's avatar

Mother in law was hospitalised within hours of the "clot shot" jab.

Then had to have 3 operations to remove clots from her legs.

Another poor fellow at my church was in ICU for weeks when his lines filled with clots.

These poisons should never have been released.

Expand full comment
Jillian Stirling's avatar

I am so glad AstraZeneca has been withdrawn. Those two scientists who wrote that book and receive honours should be jailed.

Expand full comment
Jillian Stirling's avatar

These injections should be taken off the market.

Expand full comment
Chris's avatar

Jillian - Sarah Gilbert is a liar. She claimed that they used new techniques to be able to avoid long term testing, and received accolades and is now a Dame.

Of course, we know she was lying and that the clot shot did nothing for covid and killed countless people and maimed even more.

Why has she not had her peerage revoked and had all those awards removed?

Why is Dr Young here in QLD now the Governor when she too lied continuously and caused all sorts of harms with her idiotic and reckless advice during the covid dystopia?

Far too many criminals are still free to do whatever they please whilst my uncle and many others are dead because of the poison shots.

Expand full comment
Jillian Stirling's avatar

I haven't voted for the uniparty for years. I always vote for minor parties. The uniparty have done nothing for us except destroy us during covid and now with net zero. Every time I think it safe to vote for them Dutton makes stupid pronouncements like his one on the safety Karen. The coalitions needs to be different-no net zero climate tosh, a complete stop to immigration , reform education, pull back on welfare-no more cake till people get to work, stop all the dangerous experimentation on Children, ban abortion and same sex marriage(call it a civil union not a marriage)no more mindlessly supporting the US in their forever wars and start deporting the terrorists who want to kill the Jewish people. Then I would think more seriously about the Uniparty.

The Tories deserve what they got. The redwall politicians all lost their seats and quite rightly. Your man sounds good except for his words on Al Johnson. Peter Hitchens predicted that he would be terrible and he was.

Expand full comment
Woodsman's avatar

John, as always, insightful and illuminating. I value your contribution to the national issues enormously.

Expand full comment
Keith.'s avatar

John, The "broad church" comment applies to gender, religion, social status, I believe.

The origins of the candidates should be a diverse reflection of society as a whole, so that their origins are broad. That is, they should welcome candidates from diverse backgrounds but should preach and believe the values of the party, without question. There is a progression from a candidates background to understanding deeply the party philosophy. A time progression.

This is little understood here in Australia or it seems in Britain, and it spells disaster for the party.

Expand full comment
chris n barb sheppard's avatar

I wonder if the move away from major parties is a reflection of the modern multicultural society in Australia and UK? If so, how do we maintain our Australian values and form a government to represent all Australians? BARB

Expand full comment
Ian Guthrie's avatar

What nonsense, complete rubbish!

We can already see in Australia where the proliferation of minor parties is taking us courtesy of the (fake) Greens and that other 'coloured' mob we have a totally incompetant goverenment that refuses to listen to the electorate.

If we are ever to again have a govenment with a clear majority and right to govern the 'two party' system must in fact be strengthened. How can a party that actually gains a majority of votes not be the goverening party ... simple the system does not listen to the majority of the population, ... the voice of the people is manipulated and corrupted by the preferential system.

What Australia needs to do right now is dump the preferential voting system in favour of 'one vote per person'. The preferential system is too easily corruptable with people who may only receive a few hundred votes displacing other far more desirable and worthy candidates.

Expand full comment
CommnSense's avatar

1. The system is rigged by the UniParty so that they receive massive taxpayer money for each vote they attract, supposedly to "pay for electoral expenses, past and future". This practice is extortionate and effectively criminal to the common voter and taxpayer. It should be abolished. Let donors and party operatives pay for their own expenses. Minor parties have to pay for their own election costs, past and future.

2. The 2PP system should be changed to ensure that voters can prevent their votes from being passed on to the UniParty.

3. Voter ID should be compulsory and there should be an online cross-check system to ensure that no person can vote for someone else or vote more than once. This practice of cheating does happen (think of useful idiots GetUp, Greens and Labor's Unions)

4. How do we stop the plethora of ridiculous minor parties being registered. Their mission is to capture naive rebel voters whose votes are always passed on to Greens or Labor via the corruptible 2PP system.

5. How is it that the UniParty both have allegiance to the UN/WEF before Australia's interests? They promise X policies to the voters, but immediately after winning an election, they shove X aside and proceed immediately to work for Y policies for the UN/WEF/Globalist billionaires, against the interests of Australia and it's people. The Climate Change hoax and the DEI push are typical examples of Y before X.

6. All parties must be allowed to participate in pre-election debates at prime time debates, not just the UniParty candidates.

7. All preferences must be advertised to voters at least two weeks before the election to expose backroom deals and to allow the media and voters to ask questions on such preferencing.

Expand full comment
Keith.'s avatar

John, The "broad church" comment applies to gender, religion, social status, I believe.

The origins of the candidates should be a diverse reflection of society as a whole, so that their origins are broad. That is, they should welcome candidates from diverse backgrounds but should preach and believe the values of the party, without question. There is a progression from a candidates background to understanding deeply the party philosophy. A time progression.

This is little understood here in Australia or it seems in Britain, and it spells disaster for the party.

Expand full comment